reaction

This guy asked the people of Reddit's AITA community whether or not he was in the wrong for calling his girlfriend a spoiled brat, because her parents pay for everything. People in the comments section all seem to agree that the dude was stepping way out of line with his "assessment." Basically, you jealous, bro?

It's all about the context here in this particular AITA. Dad had saved money for his son's college fund, which ultimately didn't end up getting used, because his son decided to drop out. Fast forward, and the son is asking his dad if he could tap into the college fund for what sounds like newlywed expenses/alleviating debt. Dad was not about it, because the whole point of the money was for it to be used for college. 

This dad took to Reddit to ask folks whether or not he was in the wrong for wanting to continue his enjoyment of bacon, even though it created distress for his vegan daughter's lifestyle. Folks seem to agree that dad isn't doing anything wrong at all. 

If this couple didn't want someone else to see their domestic dispute, and dramatic antics, then maybe, just maybe, they should've kept the whole "show" inside. But no, instead they aired out that dirty laundry, and the dude decided to spectate while eating a bag of popcorn. I mean, that's what every entertaining show calls for. 

This bride asked folks on Reddit whether or not she was in the wrong for wanting to ban kids from her wedding. She wanted none of the crying and other kinds of chaos that kids can create in those moments when everyone else is trying to keep some order in the atmosphere. People in the comments section seem to be in agreement that she wasn't being the nicest human being with that particular desire. 

Kids have a knack for keeping everyone in the room on their toes. You never know if something you say to a kid is going to be taken completely literally. Like that one parent, who said "see ya later alligator", and proceeded to get called a chicken by their kid. The kid was clearly just trying to play the game with their logic. We certainly laughed way too hard at these. 

The more I think about it, the more I feel that this was some brilliant marketing. The company chose to create a slogan for their water bottle that plays on the fact that being alive comes with the inevitability of drinking water. Maybe not as often as we're advised to, but at some point, we're all knocking back some of that tasteless (or is it?) water. So, it'd seem that this water bottle could be for anyone. Unless you don't drink water. If that's the case, I don't understand you, but I respect you. 

Some people actually search for reasons to complain. In this case, we have a Karen who decided to make a whiny post about how she didn't see trimming trees as an essential service. Hmm. A quick reflection on that brings to mind the fact that trimming trees can be an effective way to prevent power outages. Power would seem to be an essential thing for human beings to have to run society as it is. Maybe Karen should've taken a hot second to think that one over before posting. But here we are. 

When the flow of logic in a film is disrupted in such a way that it takes the viewer of the film out of the experience, and into a mental roadblock, it's a bummer. Some plot holes are just too big for people to look past, and ultimately be able to enjoy the film. Consistency can go a long way in immersing the audience in the storyline, as it was meant to be experienced. Another plot hole covered recently, was that plot hole we can often see in zombie apocalypse movies/shows. Tumblr did it justice.

So, one bride gets left at the altar, and as a result the bride expects her sister to delay her own wedding that she had planned. Apparently, the parents pile in on the whole thing at one point, and a whole guilt trip is fueled as a result. Should one wedding be delayed like that just because another, totally separate wedding didn't go as planned? People seem to think, absolutely no delay is necessary. They are independent events.