Yeah, it almost feels like a crime how cheap some of this stuff is. Actually, some of it is! That said, a few bucks for a pineapple that started growing in 2017? Holy crap! If only someday we could add something like healthcare or housing to this list then that'd be cool too, but for now, we got these.
fruit
You've gotta hand it to r/forbiddensnacks for pointing out all the food-adjacent stuff out there. This stuff might look like crispy fried chicken, scrumptious eggs and fresh ground beef, but in fact it's actually a rock, a mushroom, and a mop. It's kinda fun.
Some of this stuff looks absolutely delicious, but watch out, it's probably an inedible gemstone. The people at r/forbiddensnacks are very serious about finding all the delicious looking non-food objects in our world, and can you blame them? These molds, landscapes and cleaning products look great.
Most things you see throughout the day are inedible, whether you like it or not. In spite of this, there are still tons of things out there that look good to eat. All you can do is wish and look at photos like these. For more, check out r/forbiddensnacks.
They look like they'll be tasty, but in fact they're forbidden. What looks like hamburgers and caramel are actually rocks and car fluid. Check out r/forbiddensnacks for more.
"Is that a delicious pile of grapes? Or is it a clutch of terrifying spider eggs?" It's the spider eggs. For more, check out r/ForbiddenSnacks.
Yeah, that's not burger meat. That's a mop. You done got fooled. Check out r/forbiddensnacks for more forbidden delicacies.
Via Mashable
This is one of those "brain teasers" that often pop up on Facebook with an annoying and statistically ambiguous title like "Only 5% of the population know the answer to this puzzle!" According to The Daily Mail, this one has been floating around since December.
For once the people in the comments actually have something worth arguing about. You may not have noticed at first but the illustrations in the last equation are different than all the other ones. Let's walk through it.
First, apples definitely equal 10, that much is clear. From the next equation you can guess that each banana bunch equals four. Now we can assume that the coconuts equal two.
So the last equation should add up to 16. 2+10+4 =16 right?
BUT there's only ONE coconut half this time and only three bananas. So is that 1+10+3=14?
This has people arguing about whether the concept of the fruit is a constant number or if that number can change as the picture of the fruit changes. To make matters worse, Dr Kevin Bowman, a Mathmatics course leader at University of Central Lancashire spoke to the Daily Mail to try to "clear" things up. According to him, they can represent whatever you want since the only unambiguous fruit is the apple. Also, everything you thought about coconuts is wrong. He concluded his interview with this:
You might even say that the two coconut pieces in the third equation are different sizes, and therefore add up to three quarters or even seven eighths when put together.
In that sense, there are an infinite amount of possible answers.
So no one can know the real answer until, somehow, the commenters on Facebook reach some sort of philosophical consensus on how we treat visual representations of fruit.
