The fashionista entrepreneurs really outdid themselves with this line of clothing. Did some disheveled penny-pinching, derelicte bum stumble into the conference room halfway through an utterly stunted, blank-faced brainstorming session or what? Then again, Nordstrom is not one to disappoint us back here at Fail Blog when it comes to, well, Fail-worthy clothing. Remember those 'mom jeans' or that expensive stone? Yep. Ever entertaining.
ridiculous
It would seem glaringly apparent that the universe quite simply, doesn't want to cash you anywhere, young lady. Props to the ravenous pack of diversified trolls that readily stepped up to bring this entirely ridiculous, egotistical, caricature of everything awry about the younger generations, back down to earth.
As far as the mark in question goes here, what are the implications? Does this dog share some sort of strange and profound bond with Donald Trump himself, or are we looking at the next (more significant?) Jesus Toast moment? Either way, people on Twitter were reasonably unsettled by this bizarre occasion.
Via Mashable
Here's his reasoning for the madness, translated via Mashable:
“Apple is a company that ‘violated’ European consumers’ rights. They refused to reimburse me, I told them: ‘Give me my money back’. They said no. So you know what’s happening? This is happening!” – before wrecking another iPhone.
Although, he doesn't get all that far before being apprehended; but still how did he even get anywhere in the first place?
Internet satirist and podcast host Virgil Texas instigated an outrageous Wikipedia-editing war over Garfield's gender that even ended up evolving into a full-on Washington Post investigation. The warring wasn't exclusive to Wikipedia though, many loyal fans and people that like to argue for the sole sake of stirring the pot, have since stepped forward to offer their opinions on the lasagna-lover's mystery gender.
Let's get a solid cringeworthy round of slowclaps going for the foolish, destructively ignorant mom who thought it'd be chill to go on the anti-sharing rant. Did she want to get herself publicly tarred and feathered via social media, for the rest of us to see? If that was the goal here; maybe a fleeting moment of fame in the Facebook spotlight....then damn, mission accomplished.
