magazine

It doesn't get much better than a sweet headline fail. We're happy when someone screws up, but when someone makes an inappropriate design fail in a newspaper or magazine, it just gives it that extra feeling of stupid that we get to savor like a warm bubble bath. For more news related stuff, here are some hot and wild headlines from the land of Florida Man.

A woman discovered this magazine article from 1958, which shows just how much the world's changed. Don't think you'll see any publications running a piece with over 100 tips on how a woman can find a husband nowadays. 

Sometimes you distort someone's features to an impossible or freakish degree, sometimes you forget to erase a naked man in the background. All in a day's photoshoppin'.

Does every good looking thing have to be fake? Yes, yes it does. Your home cooking will never be as appetizing as shoe polish and motor oil. Now pour yourself a glass of soap and read up.

Who thought any of these were going to be a good idea?

If you've ever felt like your body doesn't look quite right, remember that you can use photoshop to make yourself look like an impossible monster.

These editors really should have double checked before printing these magazines and newspapers in these layouts. 

This bout of funny, creative inspiration follows Donald Trump recently tweeting out that he was slated to be Time Person of the Year, until the magazine itself had to reach out on Twitter, to correct the fake news from the dude himself. We're impressed with the results. These are pretty great. 

Just a few weeks after President Trump was exposed for sharing fake Time covers at his golf covers, Time returned the favor with this particularly negative 'honorary' cover to his son, Donald Trump Jr. --- a clear reference to the recent controversy surrounding his released emails and ongoing collusion with the Russia investigation. 

A the glories of printed news and entertainment. An industry on the slow decline towards its inevitable death, and some of these might just be part of the reason why. 

Don't get me wrong, I love printed physical copies of things. I maintain that books aren't the same on an e-reader as they are printed. That tangible feeling of flipping through pages is an important part of the experience. 

The same goes for video games. Before consoles were connected to the internet, games were the same as printed media in that they were a finished product. What you bought was what you got, glitches and all. There were no patches or anything or ways to update the game, like printed media, the game was just the way it was.

Anyways, I'm prattling like an old fart about things even before my time. Here are some hilarious editorial mistakes that I'm sure the publishers wish they could edit and take back. Which is why I'm glad I work on the internet. If I screw shit up I can just go back and fix it.